{"id":21,"date":"2001-04-27T00:00:52","date_gmt":"2001-04-27T07:00:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mii.ucla.edu\/causality\/?p=32"},"modified":"2001-04-27T00:00:52","modified_gmt":"2001-04-27T07:00:52","slug":"intuition-for-tight-bounds-under-noncompliance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/causality.cs.ucla.edu\/blog\/index.php\/2001\/04\/27\/intuition-for-tight-bounds-under-noncompliance\/","title":{"rendered":"Intuition for tight bounds under noncompliance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>From <\/strong><font><strong>Erich Battistin, University College, London:<\/strong><\/font><\/p>\n<p><font>I&#39;m a Ph.D. student in statistics at the Dept. of Economics of UCL, London; in the last few months I went through your papers (and your book) about causality &#8211; in particular, I paid more attention to your result on the improvement of Manski&#39;s bounds on treatment effects when we have imperfect compliance. This result is certainly powerful but &#8211; leaving out technicalities &#8211; I don&#39;t really understand which information your approach exploits that the one by Manski does not. What is the intuition behind? I didn&#39;t find this point explained in any paper I read (but obviously to deal with an &#39;econometric-based&#39; audience as the one here at UCL you need to make this point clear).<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From Erich Battistin, University College, London: I&#39;m a Ph.D. student in statistics at the Dept. of Economics of UCL, London; in the last few months I went through your papers (and your book) about causality &#8211; in particular, I paid more attention to your result on the improvement of Manski&#39;s bounds on treatment effects when [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-noncompliance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/causality.cs.ucla.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/causality.cs.ucla.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/causality.cs.ucla.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/causality.cs.ucla.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/causality.cs.ucla.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/causality.cs.ucla.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/causality.cs.ucla.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/causality.cs.ucla.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/causality.cs.ucla.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}